Skip to main content

North Ryde vs Wagstaffe

Property investment comparison - North Ryde, NSW 2113 vs Wagstaffe, NSW 2257

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: North Ryde wins 4, Wagstaffe wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricNorth RydeWagstaffe
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$820K$870K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.40%1.61%
Gross rental yield (units)5.50%3.88%
1-year house growth+3.5%+4.2%
3-year house growth+7.3%-
Vacancy rate1.9%3.8%
Population14,043240

North Ryde vs Wagstaffe: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in North Ryde and $2.6M in Wagstaffe, so Wagstaffe is the cheaper entry point.

For units, North Ryde sits at a median of $820K against $870K in Wagstaffe, which makes North Ryde the more affordable unit market and Wagstaffe the pricier one.

On cash flow, North Ryde leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.40%, compared with 1.61% in Wagstaffe, a gap of 0.79 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in North Ryde and +4.2% in Wagstaffe, so recent momentum favours Wagstaffe, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in North Ryde and 3.8% in Wagstaffe, so landlords in North Ryde face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,043 against 240, roughly 59 times the size of Wagstaffe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: North Ryde for rental income, Wagstaffe for a lower purchase price, Wagstaffe for recent price momentum, North Ryde for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison