Skip to main content

Oberon vs Woodburn

Property investment comparison - Oberon, NSW 2787 vs Woodburn, NSW 2472

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Oberon wins 2, Woodburn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOberonWoodburn
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price$445K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-5.94%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%-
1-year house growth+5.0%+4.8%
3-year house growth+13.4%+61.9%
Vacancy rate1.5%2.0%
Population3,319743

Oberon vs Woodburn: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Oberon and $560K in Woodburn.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.0% in Oberon and +4.8% in Woodburn, so recent momentum favours Oberon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Oberon houses are +13.4% and Woodburn houses +61.9%, so Woodburn has compounded faster than Oberon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Oberon and 2.0% in Woodburn, so landlords in Oberon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oberon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,319 against 743, roughly 4.5 times the size of Woodburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oberon for recent price momentum, Oberon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison