Skip to main content

Old Guildford vs Sydney

Property investment comparison - Old Guildford, NSW 2161 vs Sydney, NSW 2000

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Old Guildford wins 3, Sydney wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricOld GuildfordSydney
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$470K$1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.60%4.31%
Gross rental yield (units)6.30%5.20%
1-year house growth+17.2%-
3-year house growth+60.4%-
Vacancy rate1.0%1.2%
Population2,85716,667

Old Guildford vs Sydney: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.5M in Old Guildford and $1.5M in Sydney.

For units, Old Guildford sits at a median of $470K against $1M in Sydney, which makes Old Guildford the more affordable unit market and Sydney the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sydney leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.31%, compared with 2.60% in Old Guildford, a gap of 1.71 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Old Guildford and 1.2% in Sydney, so landlords in Old Guildford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sydney is the bigger suburb, with a population of 16,667 against 2,857, roughly 6 times the size of Old Guildford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sydney for rental income, Old Guildford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison