Ouyen vs Tittybong
Property investment comparison - Ouyen, VIC 3490 vs Tittybong, VIC 3542
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ouyen wins 0, Tittybong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ouyen | Tittybong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $290K | $270K |
| Median unit price | $330K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.20% | 7.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.75% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +53.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.4% | - |
| Population | 1,170 | 3 |
Ouyen vs Tittybong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $290K in Ouyen and $270K in Tittybong, so Tittybong is the cheaper entry point, with Ouyen houses about 7% dearer.
On cash flow, Tittybong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 7.07%, compared with 6.20% in Ouyen, a gap of 0.87 percentage points.
Ouyen is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,170 against 3, roughly 390 times the size of Tittybong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tittybong for rental income, Tittybong for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison