Skip to main content

Pacific Palms vs Tuggerah

Property investment comparison - Pacific Palms, NSW 2428 vs Tuggerah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pacific Palms wins 2, Tuggerah wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPacific PalmsTuggerah
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$545K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.28%3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)5.32%4.28%
1-year house growth+3.1%+3.4%estimate
3-year house growth+54.9%-
Vacancy rate1.0%0.7%
Population25,187925

Pacific Palms vs Tuggerah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Pacific Palms and $820K in Tuggerah.

On cash flow, Pacific Palms leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.28%, compared with 3.97% in Tuggerah, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.1% in Pacific Palms and +3.4% in Tuggerah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tuggerah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Tuggerah and 1.0% in Pacific Palms, so landlords in Tuggerah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pacific Palms is the bigger suburb, with a population of 25,187 against 925, roughly 27 times the size of Tuggerah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pacific Palms for rental income, Tuggerah for recent price momentum, Tuggerah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison