Skip to main content

Park Ridge South vs Salisbury East

Property investment comparison - Park Ridge South, QLD 4125 vs Salisbury East, QLD 4107

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Park Ridge South wins 1, Salisbury East wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPark Ridge SouthSalisbury East
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$1.1M$1.0M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.85%2.81%
Gross rental yield (units)2.70%2.77%
1-year house growth+3.0%-
3-year house growth+44.7%-
Vacancy rate2.5%1.5%
Population1,6806,790

Park Ridge South vs Salisbury East: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Park Ridge South and $1.4M in Salisbury East, so Salisbury East is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Park Ridge South sits at a median of $1.1M against $1.0M in Salisbury East, which makes Salisbury East the more affordable unit market and Park Ridge South the pricier one.

On cash flow, Park Ridge South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.85%, compared with 2.81% in Salisbury East, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Salisbury East and 2.5% in Park Ridge South, so landlords in Salisbury East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,790 against 1,680, roughly 4.0 times the size of Park Ridge South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Park Ridge South for rental income, Salisbury East for a lower purchase price, Salisbury East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison