Skip to main content

Parkwood vs Sandgate

Property investment comparison - Parkwood, QLD 4214 vs Sandgate, QLD 4017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Parkwood wins 3, Sandgate wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricParkwoodSandgate
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$595K$955K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.94%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.73%
1-year house growth+13.4%+13.2%
3-year house growth+39.8%+29.0%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.4%
Population8,8374,926

Parkwood vs Sandgate: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Parkwood and $1.3M in Sandgate.

For units, Parkwood sits at a median of $595K against $955K in Sandgate, which makes Parkwood the more affordable unit market and Sandgate the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.4% in Parkwood and +13.2% in Sandgate, so recent momentum favours Parkwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Parkwood houses are +39.8% and Sandgate houses +29.0%, so Parkwood has compounded faster than Sandgate over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Sandgate and 1.9% in Parkwood, so landlords in Sandgate face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkwood is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,837 against 4,926, larger than Sandgate; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Parkwood for recent price momentum, Sandgate for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison