Skip to main content

Paulls Valley vs Quindalup

Property investment comparison - Paulls Valley, WA 6076 vs Quindalup, WA 6281

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Paulls Valley wins 5, Quindalup wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPaulls ValleyQuindalup
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$295K$1.7M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.08%2.81%
1-year house growth-+18.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.2%0.9%
Population831,488

Paulls Valley vs Quindalup: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Paulls Valley and $2.0M in Quindalup, so Paulls Valley is the cheaper entry point, with Quindalup houses about 3% dearer.

For units, Paulls Valley sits at a median of $295K against $1.7M in Quindalup, which makes Paulls Valley the more affordable unit market and Quindalup the pricier one.

On cash flow, Paulls Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.08% in Quindalup, a gap of 0.91 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Paulls Valley and 0.9% in Quindalup, so landlords in Paulls Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Quindalup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,488 against 83, roughly 18 times the size of Paulls Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Paulls Valley for rental income, Paulls Valley for a lower purchase price, Paulls Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison