Skip to main content

Paulls Valley vs South Fremantle

Property investment comparison - Paulls Valley, WA 6076 vs South Fremantle, WA 6162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Paulls Valley wins 4, South Fremantle wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPaulls ValleySouth Fremantle
Median house price$2.0M$2M
Median unit price$295K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)4.08%4.95%
1-year house growth-+10.0%
3-year house growth-+33.4%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.3%
Population833,398

Paulls Valley vs South Fremantle: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Paulls Valley and $2M in South Fremantle, so Paulls Valley is the cheaper entry point, with South Fremantle houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Paulls Valley sits at a median of $295K against $850K in South Fremantle, which makes Paulls Valley the more affordable unit market and South Fremantle the pricier one.

On cash flow, Paulls Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.52% in South Fremantle, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Paulls Valley and 0.3% in South Fremantle, so landlords in Paulls Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Fremantle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,398 against 83, roughly 41 times the size of Paulls Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Paulls Valley for rental income, Paulls Valley for a lower purchase price, Paulls Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison