Skip to main content

Paulls Valley vs Wembley

Property investment comparison - Paulls Valley, WA 6076 vs Wembley, WA 6014

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Paulls Valley wins 3, Wembley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPaulls ValleyWembley
Median house price$2.0M$1.9M
Median unit price$295K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%2.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.08%5.75%
1-year house growth-+9.8%
3-year house growth-+37.5%
Vacancy rate0.2%0.9%
Population8312,061

Paulls Valley vs Wembley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Paulls Valley and $1.9M in Wembley, so Wembley is the cheaper entry point, with Paulls Valley houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Paulls Valley sits at a median of $295K against $555K in Wembley, which makes Paulls Valley the more affordable unit market and Wembley the pricier one.

On cash flow, Paulls Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.99%, compared with 2.80% in Wembley, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Paulls Valley and 0.9% in Wembley, so landlords in Paulls Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wembley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,061 against 83, roughly 145 times the size of Paulls Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Paulls Valley for rental income, Wembley for a lower purchase price, Paulls Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison