Pelaw Main vs Windale
Property investment comparison - Pelaw Main, NSW 2327 vs Windale, NSW 2306
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pelaw Main wins 0, Windale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Pelaw Main | Windale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780K | $780K |
| Median unit price | - | $385K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.47% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.48% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.3%estimate | +16.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 1,080 | 3,421 |
Pelaw Main vs Windale: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Pelaw Main and $780K in Windale.
Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Pelaw Main (an estimate) and +16.4% in Windale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Windale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Windale and 0.6% in Pelaw Main, so landlords in Windale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Windale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,421 against 1,080, roughly 3.2 times the size of Pelaw Main; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Windale for recent price momentum, Windale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison