Skip to main content

Picketts Valley vs Stanmore

Property investment comparison - Picketts Valley, NSW 2251 vs Stanmore, NSW 2048

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Picketts Valley wins 3, Stanmore wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPicketts ValleyStanmore
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$835K$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%2.45%
Gross rental yield (units)3.88%3.50%
1-year house growth-+5.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population2217,619

Picketts Valley vs Stanmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Picketts Valley and $2.6M in Stanmore, so Stanmore is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Picketts Valley sits at a median of $835K against $980K in Stanmore, which makes Picketts Valley the more affordable unit market and Stanmore the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.46% in Picketts Valley and 2.45% in Stanmore, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Stanmore and 1.6% in Picketts Valley, so landlords in Stanmore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Stanmore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,619 against 221, roughly 34 times the size of Picketts Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stanmore for a lower purchase price, Stanmore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison