Skip to main content

Picton vs Whitebridge

Property investment comparison - Picton, NSW 2571 vs Whitebridge, NSW 2290

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Picton wins 1, Whitebridge wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPictonWhitebridge
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$620K$855K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.01%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.58%
1-year house growth+4.9%+6.4%
3-year house growth+19.3%+30.1%
Vacancy rate2.0%1.2%
Population5,2822,900

Picton vs Whitebridge: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Picton and $1.3M in Whitebridge.

For units, Picton sits at a median of $620K against $855K in Whitebridge, which makes Picton the more affordable unit market and Whitebridge the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Picton and +6.4% in Whitebridge, so recent momentum favours Whitebridge, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Picton houses are +19.3% and Whitebridge houses +30.1%, so Whitebridge has compounded faster than Picton over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Whitebridge and 2.0% in Picton, so landlords in Whitebridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Picton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,282 against 2,900, larger than Whitebridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Whitebridge for recent price momentum, Whitebridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison