Skip to main content

Pine Lodge vs Wangaratta

Property investment comparison - Pine Lodge, VIC 3631 vs Wangaratta, VIC 3677

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pine Lodge wins 2, Wangaratta wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPine LodgeWangaratta
Median house price$560K$565K
Median unit price$990K$400K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.94%4.90%
Gross rental yield (units)2.62%5.30%
1-year house growth-+7.6%
3-year house growth-+9.0%
Vacancy rate1.4%0.8%
Population26719,214

Pine Lodge vs Wangaratta: what the numbers say

The median house price is $560K in Pine Lodge and $565K in Wangaratta, so Pine Lodge is the cheaper entry point, with Wangaratta houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Pine Lodge sits at a median of $990K against $400K in Wangaratta, which makes Wangaratta the more affordable unit market and Pine Lodge the pricier one.

On cash flow, Pine Lodge leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.94%, compared with 4.90% in Wangaratta, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wangaratta and 1.4% in Pine Lodge, so landlords in Wangaratta face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wangaratta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,214 against 267, roughly 72 times the size of Pine Lodge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Pine Lodge for rental income, Pine Lodge for a lower purchase price, Wangaratta for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison