Pinjarra vs Webberton
Property investment comparison - Pinjarra, WA 6208 vs Webberton, WA 6530
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pinjarra wins 1, Webberton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Pinjarra | Webberton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $705K |
| Median unit price | - | $465K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.26% | 4.31% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.20% | 4.58% |
| 1-year house growth | +22.6% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +68.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 1.0% |
| Population | 4,914 | 158 |
Pinjarra vs Webberton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $700K in Pinjarra and $705K in Webberton, so Pinjarra is the cheaper entry point, with Webberton houses about 1% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.26% in Pinjarra and 4.31% in Webberton, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Webberton and 2.2% in Pinjarra, so landlords in Webberton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Pinjarra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,914 against 158, roughly 31 times the size of Webberton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Pinjarra for a lower purchase price, Webberton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison