Pootilla vs Scoresby
Property investment comparison - Pootilla, VIC 3352 vs Scoresby, VIC 3179
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Pootilla wins 2, Scoresby wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Pootilla | Scoresby |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Median unit price | - | $720K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.47% | 3.32% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.40% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +0.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.6% | 2.4% |
| Population | 79 | 6,066 |
Pootilla vs Scoresby: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.0M in Pootilla and $1.0M in Scoresby, so Pootilla is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Scoresby leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.32%, compared with 2.47% in Pootilla, a gap of 0.85 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Pootilla and 2.4% in Scoresby, so landlords in Pootilla face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Scoresby is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,066 against 79, roughly 77 times the size of Pootilla; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Scoresby for rental income, Pootilla for a lower purchase price, Pootilla for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison