Skip to main content

Port Adelaide vs Ridgehaven

Property investment comparison - Port Adelaide, SA 5015 vs Ridgehaven, SA 5097

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Port Adelaide wins 4, Ridgehaven wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricPort AdelaideRidgehaven
Median house price$870K$880K
Median unit price$700K$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.51%4.30%
1-year house growth+15.3%estimate+14.0%
3-year house growth-+36.0%
Vacancy rate0.6%0.9%
Population1,3384,304

Port Adelaide vs Ridgehaven: what the numbers say

The median house price is $870K in Port Adelaide and $880K in Ridgehaven, so Port Adelaide is the cheaper entry point, with Ridgehaven houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Port Adelaide sits at a median of $700K against $660K in Ridgehaven, which makes Ridgehaven the more affordable unit market and Port Adelaide the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.3% in Port Adelaide (an estimate) and +14.0% in Ridgehaven, so recent momentum favours Port Adelaide, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Port Adelaide and 0.9% in Ridgehaven, so landlords in Port Adelaide face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ridgehaven is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,304 against 1,338, roughly 3.2 times the size of Port Adelaide; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Port Adelaide for a lower purchase price, Port Adelaide for recent price momentum, Port Adelaide for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison