Quirindi vs The Rock
Property investment comparison - Quirindi, NSW 2343 vs The Rock, NSW 2655
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Quirindi wins 3, The Rock wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Quirindi | The Rock |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $450K | $455K |
| Median unit price | - | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.71% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.15% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.6% |
| 3-year house growth | +54.7% | +28.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 2.0% |
| Population | 3,355 | 1,347 |
Quirindi vs The Rock: what the numbers say
The median house price is $450K in Quirindi and $455K in The Rock, so Quirindi is the cheaper entry point, with The Rock houses about 1% dearer.
Looking back three years, Quirindi houses are +54.7% and The Rock houses +28.3%, so Quirindi has compounded faster than The Rock over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Quirindi and 2.0% in The Rock, so landlords in Quirindi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Quirindi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,355 against 1,347, roughly 2.5 times the size of The Rock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Quirindi for a lower purchase price, Quirindi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison