Raworth vs Warrawong
Property investment comparison - Raworth, NSW 2321 vs Warrawong, NSW 2502
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Raworth wins 0, Warrawong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Raworth | Warrawong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $905K | $905K |
| Median unit price | - | $490K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.74% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.12% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.3%estimate | +8.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 0.5% |
| Population | 2,094 | 4,659 |
Raworth vs Warrawong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $905K in Raworth and $905K in Warrawong.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Raworth (an estimate) and +8.3% in Warrawong (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Warrawong, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Warrawong and 2.5% in Raworth, so landlords in Warrawong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Warrawong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,659 against 2,094, roughly 2.2 times the size of Raworth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warrawong for recent price momentum, Warrawong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison