Skip to main content

Riverhills vs Yandina

Property investment comparison - Riverhills, QLD 4074 vs Yandina, QLD 4561

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Riverhills wins 2, Yandina wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRiverhillsYandina
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$795K$745K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.31%3.68%
Gross rental yield (units)3.05%4.35%
1-year house growth--
3-year house growth+51.2%+36.1%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.5%
Population4,1213,073

Riverhills vs Yandina: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Riverhills and $1.2M in Yandina, so Riverhills is the cheaper entry point, with Yandina houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Riverhills sits at a median of $795K against $745K in Yandina, which makes Yandina the more affordable unit market and Riverhills the pricier one.

On cash flow, Yandina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.68%, compared with 3.31% in Riverhills, a gap of 0.37 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Riverhills houses are +51.2% and Yandina houses +36.1%, so Riverhills has compounded faster than Yandina over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Yandina and 0.9% in Riverhills, so landlords in Yandina face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Riverhills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,121 against 3,073, larger than Yandina; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yandina for rental income, Riverhills for a lower purchase price, Yandina for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison