Skip to main content

Roseville Chase vs Turramurra

Property investment comparison - Roseville Chase, NSW 2069 vs Turramurra, NSW 2074

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Roseville Chase wins 2, Turramurra wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRoseville ChaseTurramurra
Median house price$3.4M$3.4M
Median unit price$955K$860K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.91%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.76%4.30%
1-year house growth-4.9%estimate+1.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.2%3.3%
Population1,61812,850

Roseville Chase vs Turramurra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $3.4M in Roseville Chase and $3.4M in Turramurra, so Turramurra is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Roseville Chase sits at a median of $955K against $860K in Turramurra, which makes Turramurra the more affordable unit market and Roseville Chase the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.9% in Roseville Chase (an estimate) and +1.1% in Turramurra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Turramurra, while Roseville Chase went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 3.2% in Roseville Chase and 3.3% in Turramurra, so landlords in Roseville Chase face less competition for tenants.

Turramurra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,850 against 1,618, roughly 8 times the size of Roseville Chase; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Turramurra for a lower purchase price, Turramurra for recent price momentum, Roseville Chase for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison