Skip to main content

Rydalmere vs Woolloomooloo

Property investment comparison - Rydalmere, NSW 2116 vs Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rydalmere wins 2, Woolloomooloo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRydalmereWoolloomooloo
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$730K$1.1M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.16%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%-
1-year house growth+0.4%estimate+1.7%
3-year house growth-+21.6%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.9%
Population7,2743,792

Rydalmere vs Woolloomooloo: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Rydalmere and $1.9M in Woolloomooloo.

For units, Rydalmere sits at a median of $730K against $1.1M in Woolloomooloo, which makes Rydalmere the more affordable unit market and Woolloomooloo the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.4% in Rydalmere (an estimate) and +1.7% in Woolloomooloo, so recent momentum favours Woolloomooloo, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rydalmere and 1.9% in Woolloomooloo, so landlords in Rydalmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rydalmere is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,274 against 3,792, larger than Woolloomooloo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolloomooloo for recent price momentum, Rydalmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison