Skip to main content

Ryde vs Woolooware

Property investment comparison - Ryde, NSW 2112 vs Woolooware, NSW 2230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ryde wins 3, Woolooware wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricRydeWoolooware
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$740K$995K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)4.88%3.92%
1-year house growth+1.2%estimate+6.3%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%2.4%
Population31,9075,060

Ryde vs Woolooware: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Ryde and $2.6M in Woolooware, so Woolooware is the cheaper entry point, with Ryde houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ryde sits at a median of $740K against $995K in Woolooware, which makes Ryde the more affordable unit market and Woolooware the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.2% in Ryde (an estimate) and +6.3% in Woolooware (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woolooware, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Ryde and 2.4% in Woolooware, so landlords in Ryde face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ryde is the bigger suburb, with a population of 31,907 against 5,060, roughly 6 times the size of Woolooware; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woolooware for a lower purchase price, Woolooware for recent price momentum, Ryde for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison