Skip to main content

Sadliers Crossing vs Urraween

Property investment comparison - Sadliers Crossing, QLD 4305 vs Urraween, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sadliers Crossing wins 3, Urraween wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSadliers CrossingUrraween
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.55%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.50%4.81%
1-year house growth+13.7%+12.3%
3-year house growth+54.7%+27.9%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.9%
Population1,3587,951

Sadliers Crossing vs Urraween: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Sadliers Crossing and $830K in Urraween.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.7% in Sadliers Crossing and +12.3% in Urraween, so recent momentum favours Sadliers Crossing, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Sadliers Crossing houses are +54.7% and Urraween houses +27.9%, so Sadliers Crossing has compounded faster than Urraween over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Sadliers Crossing and 1.9% in Urraween, so landlords in Sadliers Crossing face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Urraween is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,951 against 1,358, roughly 6 times the size of Sadliers Crossing; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sadliers Crossing for recent price momentum, Sadliers Crossing for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison