Skip to main content

Salisbury vs Seventeen Mile Rocks

Property investment comparison - Salisbury, QLD 4107 vs Seventeen Mile Rocks, QLD 4073

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Salisbury wins 1, Seventeen Mile Rocks wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSalisburySeventeen Mile Rocks
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.16%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.34%
1-year house growth+12.0%estimate+9.0%
3-year house growth-+58.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%0.8%
Population6,7902,699

Salisbury vs Seventeen Mile Rocks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Salisbury and $1.3M in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so Seventeen Mile Rocks is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Salisbury (an estimate) and +9.0% in Seventeen Mile Rocks, so recent momentum favours Salisbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Seventeen Mile Rocks and 1.5% in Salisbury, so landlords in Seventeen Mile Rocks face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Salisbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,790 against 2,699, roughly 2.5 times the size of Seventeen Mile Rocks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seventeen Mile Rocks for a lower purchase price, Salisbury for recent price momentum, Seventeen Mile Rocks for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Salisbury vs Seventeen Mile Rocks: Suburb Comparison 2026