Skip to main content

Samson vs The Vines

Property investment comparison - Samson, WA 6163 vs The Vines, WA 6069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Samson wins 1, The Vines wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSamsonThe Vines
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.25%3.67%
Gross rental yield (units)-2.68%
1-year house growth+15.7%estimate+13.4%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.2%0.5%
Population1,8815,848

Samson vs The Vines: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Samson and $1.2M in The Vines.

On cash flow, The Vines leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.67%, compared with 3.25% in Samson, a gap of 0.42 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.7% in Samson (an estimate) and +13.4% in The Vines (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Samson, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in The Vines and 1.2% in Samson, so landlords in The Vines face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

The Vines is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,848 against 1,881, roughly 3.1 times the size of Samson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: The Vines for rental income, Samson for recent price momentum, The Vines for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison