Skip to main content

San Remo vs Werribee South

Property investment comparison - San Remo, VIC 3925 vs Werribee South, VIC 3030

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: San Remo wins 2, Werribee South wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSan RemoWerribee South
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$435K$410K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.52%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-5.8%-6.6%estimate
3-year house growth-14.3%-
Vacancy rate0.8%1.6%
Population1,7002,392

San Remo vs Werribee South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in San Remo and $850K in Werribee South.

For units, San Remo sits at a median of $435K against $410K in Werribee South, which makes Werribee South the more affordable unit market and San Remo the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.8% in San Remo and -6.6% in Werribee South (an estimate), so recent momentum favours San Remo, while Werribee South went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in San Remo and 1.6% in Werribee South, so landlords in San Remo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Werribee South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,392 against 1,700, larger than San Remo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: San Remo for recent price momentum, San Remo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison