Skip to main content

Sawtell vs Tighes Hill

Property investment comparison - Sawtell, NSW 2452 vs Tighes Hill, NSW 2297

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sawtell wins 3, Tighes Hill wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSawtellTighes Hill
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$750K$945K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.08%3.05%
Gross rental yield (units)3.60%3.83%
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+7.2%
3-year house growth-+20.8%
Vacancy rate2.2%1.3%
Population3,7881,801

Sawtell vs Tighes Hill: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Sawtell and $1.3M in Tighes Hill.

For units, Sawtell sits at a median of $750K against $945K in Tighes Hill, which makes Sawtell the more affordable unit market and Tighes Hill the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.08% in Sawtell and 3.05% in Tighes Hill, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Sawtell (an estimate) and +7.2% in Tighes Hill, so recent momentum favours Sawtell, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Tighes Hill and 2.2% in Sawtell, so landlords in Tighes Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sawtell is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,788 against 1,801, roughly 2.1 times the size of Tighes Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sawtell for recent price momentum, Tighes Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison