Skip to main content

Schofields vs Speers Point

Property investment comparison - Schofields, NSW 2762 vs Speers Point, NSW 2284

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Schofields wins 1, Speers Point wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSchofieldsSpeers Point
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$620K$970K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.44%-
1-year house growth+4.2%+12.7%
3-year house growth-3.0%+34.6%
Vacancy rate3.5%0.7%
Population15,2133,400

Schofields vs Speers Point: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Schofields and $1.3M in Speers Point.

For units, Schofields sits at a median of $620K against $970K in Speers Point, which makes Schofields the more affordable unit market and Speers Point the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.2% in Schofields and +12.7% in Speers Point, so recent momentum favours Speers Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Schofields houses are -3.0% and Speers Point houses +34.6%, so Speers Point has compounded faster than Schofields over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Speers Point and 3.5% in Schofields, so landlords in Speers Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Schofields is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,213 against 3,400, roughly 4.5 times the size of Speers Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Speers Point for recent price momentum, Speers Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison