Scott Creek vs Waterloo Corner
Property investment comparison - Scott Creek, SA 5153 vs Waterloo Corner, SA 5110
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Scott Creek wins 2, Waterloo Corner wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Scott Creek | Waterloo Corner |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $600K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.08% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +5.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +41.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.1% |
| Population | 225 | 1,103 |
Scott Creek vs Waterloo Corner: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Scott Creek and $1.4M in Waterloo Corner, so Scott Creek is the cheaper entry point, with Waterloo Corner houses about 3% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Scott Creek and 1.1% in Waterloo Corner, so landlords in Scott Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Waterloo Corner is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,103 against 225, roughly 4.9 times the size of Scott Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Scott Creek for a lower purchase price, Scott Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Waterloo Corner, SA 5110
Open Waterloo Corner suburb profileRecent sales in Waterloo Corner
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison