Skip to main content

Shalvey vs Tullimbar

Property investment comparison - Shalvey, NSW 2770 vs Tullimbar, NSW 2527

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Shalvey wins 5, Tullimbar wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricShalveyTullimbar
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$460K$875K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.29%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.31%4.56%
1-year house growth+9.4%+7.0%
3-year house growth+35.4%+9.2%
Vacancy rate0.4%0.6%
Population3,4551,840

Shalvey vs Tullimbar: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Shalvey and $920K in Tullimbar.

For units, Shalvey sits at a median of $460K against $875K in Tullimbar, which makes Shalvey the more affordable unit market and Tullimbar the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Shalvey and +7.0% in Tullimbar, so recent momentum favours Shalvey, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Shalvey houses are +35.4% and Tullimbar houses +9.2%, so Shalvey has compounded faster than Tullimbar over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Shalvey and 0.6% in Tullimbar, so landlords in Shalvey face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Shalvey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,455 against 1,840, larger than Tullimbar; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Shalvey for recent price momentum, Shalvey for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison