Smithfield vs Zadows Landing
Property investment comparison - Smithfield, SA 5114 vs Zadows Landing, SA 5254
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Smithfield wins 2, Zadows Landing wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Smithfield | Zadows Landing |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $655K | $645K |
| Median unit price | - | $1.0M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.10% | 2.94% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.85% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +20.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +44.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 9.2% |
| Population | 2,482 | 25 |
Smithfield vs Zadows Landing: what the numbers say
The median house price is $655K in Smithfield and $645K in Zadows Landing, so Zadows Landing is the cheaper entry point, with Smithfield houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Smithfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.10%, compared with 2.94% in Zadows Landing, a gap of 1.16 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Smithfield and 9.2% in Zadows Landing, so landlords in Smithfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Smithfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,482 against 25, roughly 99 times the size of Zadows Landing; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Smithfield for rental income, Zadows Landing for a lower purchase price, Smithfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison