Skip to main content

South Lismore vs Urbenville

Property investment comparison - South Lismore, NSW 2480 vs Urbenville, NSW 2475

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: South Lismore wins 4, Urbenville wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSouth LismoreUrbenville
Median house price$405K$410K
Median unit price-$255K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.80%3.35%
Gross rental yield (units)5.01%3.38%
1-year house growth+16.7%-
3-year house growth+61.5%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.9%
Population1,775331

South Lismore vs Urbenville: what the numbers say

The median house price is $405K in South Lismore and $410K in Urbenville, so South Lismore is the cheaper entry point, with Urbenville houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, South Lismore leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.80%, compared with 3.35% in Urbenville, a gap of 3.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in South Lismore and 1.9% in Urbenville, so landlords in South Lismore face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Lismore is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,775 against 331, roughly 5 times the size of Urbenville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Lismore for rental income, South Lismore for a lower purchase price, South Lismore for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison