Skip to main content

Stockrington vs Windellama

Property investment comparison - Stockrington, NSW 2322 vs Windellama, NSW 2580

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stockrington wins 4, Windellama wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricStockringtonWindellama
Median house price$765K$765K
Median unit price$535K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.29%3.84%
Gross rental yield (units)6.26%4.28%
1-year house growth-+20.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.8%6.1%
Population92417

Stockrington vs Windellama: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $765K in Stockrington and $765K in Windellama.

For units, Stockrington sits at a median of $535K against $560K in Windellama, which makes Stockrington the more affordable unit market and Windellama the pricier one.

On cash flow, Stockrington leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.29%, compared with 3.84% in Windellama, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.8% in Stockrington and 6.1% in Windellama, so landlords in Stockrington face less competition for tenants.

Windellama is the bigger suburb, with a population of 417 against 92, roughly 4.5 times the size of Stockrington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stockrington for rental income, Stockrington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison