Stockton vs Valentine
Property investment comparison - Stockton, NSW 2295 vs Valentine, NSW 2280
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stockton wins 2, Valentine wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Stockton | Valentine |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | - | $860K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.96% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.44% | 4.14% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.0% | +12.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +15.8% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 4.3% |
| Population | 4,046 | 5,773 |
Stockton vs Valentine: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Stockton and $1.4M in Valentine, so Stockton is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.0% in Stockton and +12.5% in Valentine (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Valentine, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Stockton and 4.3% in Valentine, so landlords in Stockton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Valentine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,773 against 4,046, larger than Stockton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stockton for a lower purchase price, Valentine for recent price momentum, Stockton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison