Skip to main content

Swanpool vs Wodonga

Property investment comparison - Swanpool, VIC 3673 vs Wodonga, VIC 3690

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Swanpool wins 1, Wodonga wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSwanpoolWodonga
Median house price$645K$645K
Median unit price$280K$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)3.51%5.33%
1-year house growth-+12.3%
3-year house growth-+18.4%
Vacancy rate3.0%1.4%
Population22720,259

Swanpool vs Wodonga: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $645K in Swanpool and $645K in Wodonga.

For units, Swanpool sits at a median of $280K against $415K in Wodonga, which makes Swanpool the more affordable unit market and Wodonga the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wodonga leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 3.90% in Swanpool, a gap of 0.50 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Wodonga and 3.0% in Swanpool, so landlords in Wodonga face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wodonga is the bigger suburb, with a population of 20,259 against 227, roughly 89 times the size of Swanpool; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wodonga for rental income, Wodonga for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison