Skip to main content

Tathra vs Woongarrah

Property investment comparison - Tathra, NSW 2550 vs Woongarrah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tathra wins 0, Woongarrah wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTathraWoongarrah
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.97%4.06%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.62%
1-year house growth+5.6%+9.8%
3-year house growth-1.4%+15.1%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.2%
Population1,5275,962

Tathra vs Woongarrah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Tathra and $1.1M in Woongarrah.

On cash flow, Woongarrah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.06%, compared with 2.97% in Tathra, a gap of 1.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.6% in Tathra and +9.8% in Woongarrah, so recent momentum favours Woongarrah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Tathra houses are -1.4% and Woongarrah houses +15.1%, so Woongarrah has compounded faster than Tathra over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Woongarrah and 1.3% in Tathra, so landlords in Woongarrah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woongarrah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,962 against 1,527, roughly 3.9 times the size of Tathra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woongarrah for rental income, Woongarrah for recent price momentum, Woongarrah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison