Skip to main content

Telarah vs Windradyne

Property investment comparison - Telarah, NSW 2320 vs Windradyne, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Telarah wins 3, Windradyne wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTelarahWindradyne
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price$360K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)8.64%5.40%
1-year house growth+12.7%+8.1%
3-year house growth+18.6%+25.8%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.9%
Population2,3183,309

Telarah vs Windradyne: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Telarah and $730K in Windradyne.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.7% in Telarah and +8.1% in Windradyne, so recent momentum favours Telarah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Telarah houses are +18.6% and Windradyne houses +25.8%, so Windradyne has compounded faster than Telarah over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Telarah and 1.9% in Windradyne, so landlords in Telarah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Windradyne is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 2,318, larger than Telarah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Telarah for recent price momentum, Telarah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison