Skip to main content

Tempe vs Wamberal

Property investment comparison - Tempe, NSW 2044 vs Wamberal, NSW 2260

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tempe wins 2, Wamberal wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTempeWamberal
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$1.7M$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.60%
Gross rental yield (units)1.83%3.05%
1-year house growth+4.1%+10.2%
3-year house growth+20.7%+7.7%
Vacancy rate1.6%2.6%
Population3,5506,991

Tempe vs Wamberal: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Tempe and $1.8M in Wamberal, so Wamberal is the cheaper entry point, with Tempe houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Tempe sits at a median of $1.7M against $1.3M in Wamberal, which makes Wamberal the more affordable unit market and Tempe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.1% in Tempe and +10.2% in Wamberal, so recent momentum favours Wamberal, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Tempe houses are +20.7% and Wamberal houses +7.7%, so Tempe has compounded faster than Wamberal over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Tempe and 2.6% in Wamberal, so landlords in Tempe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wamberal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,991 against 3,550, larger than Tempe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wamberal for a lower purchase price, Wamberal for recent price momentum, Tempe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison