Skip to main content

Thorneside vs Woodhill

Property investment comparison - Thorneside, QLD 4158 vs Woodhill, QLD 4285

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Thorneside wins 2, Woodhill wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricThornesideWoodhill
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$780K$340K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.66%
Gross rental yield (units)3.76%-
1-year house growth+11.4%+16.6%
3-year house growth+50.0%+39.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.8%
Population3,8771,231

Thorneside vs Woodhill: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Thorneside and $1.3M in Woodhill.

For units, Thorneside sits at a median of $780K against $340K in Woodhill, which makes Woodhill the more affordable unit market and Thorneside the pricier one.

On cash flow, Thorneside leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.66% in Woodhill, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Thorneside and +16.6% in Woodhill, so recent momentum favours Woodhill, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Thorneside houses are +50.0% and Woodhill houses +39.0%, so Thorneside has compounded faster than Woodhill over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.

Thorneside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,877 against 1,231, roughly 3.1 times the size of Woodhill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thorneside for rental income, Woodhill for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison