Skip to main content

Tingha vs Wellington

Property investment comparison - Tingha, NSW 2360 vs Wellington, NSW 2820

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tingha wins 2, Wellington wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTinghaWellington
Median house price$385K$380K
Median unit price$280K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)6.38%6.41%
Gross rental yield (units)5.85%4.05%
1-year house growth-10.0%estimate+20.1%
3-year house growth+10.3%+32.5%
Vacancy rate-1.3%
Population7744,096

Tingha vs Wellington: what the numbers say

The median house price is $385K in Tingha and $380K in Wellington, so Wellington is the cheaper entry point, with Tingha houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Tingha sits at a median of $280K against $425K in Wellington, which makes Tingha the more affordable unit market and Wellington the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 6.38% in Tingha and 6.41% in Wellington, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved -10.0% in Tingha (an estimate) and +20.1% in Wellington, so recent momentum favours Wellington, while Tingha went backwards.

Looking back three years, Tingha houses are +10.3% and Wellington houses +32.5%, so Wellington has compounded faster than Tingha over the longer window.

Wellington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,096 against 774, roughly 5 times the size of Tingha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wellington for a lower purchase price, Wellington for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison