Tingha vs Wyalong
Property investment comparison - Tingha, NSW 2360 vs Wyalong, NSW 2671
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tingha wins 3, Wyalong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tingha | Wyalong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $385K | $380K |
| Median unit price | $280K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.38% | 5.48% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.85% | 2.64% |
| 1-year house growth | -10.0%estimate | +22.0%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +10.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | - | 6.2% |
| Population | 774 | 620 |
Tingha vs Wyalong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $385K in Tingha and $380K in Wyalong, so Wyalong is the cheaper entry point, with Tingha houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Tingha sits at a median of $280K against $395K in Wyalong, which makes Tingha the more affordable unit market and Wyalong the pricier one.
On cash flow, Tingha leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.38%, compared with 5.48% in Wyalong, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved -10.0% in Tingha (an estimate) and +22.0% in Wyalong (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyalong, while Tingha went backwards.
Tingha is the bigger suburb, with a population of 774 against 620, larger than Wyalong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tingha for rental income, Wyalong for a lower purchase price, Wyalong for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison