Tocumwal vs Webbs Creek
Property investment comparison - Tocumwal, NSW 2714 vs Webbs Creek, NSW 2775
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tocumwal wins 2, Webbs Creek wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tocumwal | Webbs Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $525K | $530K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.71% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.60% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.2% | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 2.4% |
| Population | 2,862 | 55 |
Tocumwal vs Webbs Creek: what the numbers say
The median house price is $525K in Tocumwal and $530K in Webbs Creek, so Tocumwal is the cheaper entry point, with Webbs Creek houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Tocumwal and 2.4% in Webbs Creek, so landlords in Tocumwal face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tocumwal is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,862 against 55, roughly 52 times the size of Webbs Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tocumwal for a lower purchase price, Tocumwal for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison