Skip to main content

Toodyay vs Waggrakine

Property investment comparison - Toodyay, WA 6566 vs Waggrakine, WA 6530

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Toodyay wins 2, Waggrakine wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricToodyayWaggrakine
Median house price$630K$620K
Median unit price$285K$340K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.55%5.26%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%6.14%
1-year house growth-+18.5%
3-year house growth+62.2%+63.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population1,3622,679

Toodyay vs Waggrakine: what the numbers say

The median house price is $630K in Toodyay and $620K in Waggrakine, so Waggrakine is the cheaper entry point, with Toodyay houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Toodyay sits at a median of $285K against $340K in Waggrakine, which makes Toodyay the more affordable unit market and Waggrakine the pricier one.

On cash flow, Waggrakine leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.26%, compared with 4.55% in Toodyay, a gap of 0.71 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Toodyay houses are +62.2% and Waggrakine houses +63.0%, so Waggrakine has compounded faster than Toodyay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Toodyay and 1.1% in Waggrakine, so landlords in Toodyay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waggrakine is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,679 against 1,362, larger than Toodyay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waggrakine for rental income, Waggrakine for a lower purchase price, Toodyay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison