Skip to main content

Toronto vs Woodrising

Property investment comparison - Toronto, NSW 2283 vs Woodrising, NSW 2284

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Toronto wins 1, Woodrising wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTorontoWoodrising
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$760K$555K
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.90%6.62%
1-year house growth+11.2%+13.7%estimate
3-year house growth+23.0%-
Vacancy rate0.5%1.3%
Population5,9731,176

Toronto vs Woodrising: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Toronto and $840K in Woodrising.

For units, Toronto sits at a median of $760K against $555K in Woodrising, which makes Woodrising the more affordable unit market and Toronto the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.2% in Toronto and +13.7% in Woodrising (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Woodrising, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Toronto and 1.3% in Woodrising, so landlords in Toronto face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Toronto is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,973 against 1,176, roughly 5 times the size of Woodrising; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woodrising for recent price momentum, Toronto for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison