Skip to main content

Townsend vs Windradyne

Property investment comparison - Townsend, NSW 2463 vs Windradyne, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Townsend wins 1, Windradyne wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTownsendWindradyne
Median house price$730K$730K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.38%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)5.09%5.40%
1-year house growth+6.9%+8.1%
3-year house growth+6.5%+25.8%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.9%
Population9913,309

Townsend vs Windradyne: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Townsend and $730K in Windradyne.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.38% in Townsend and 4.40% in Windradyne, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.9% in Townsend and +8.1% in Windradyne, so recent momentum favours Windradyne, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Townsend houses are +6.5% and Windradyne houses +25.8%, so Windradyne has compounded faster than Townsend over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Townsend and 1.9% in Windradyne, so landlords in Townsend face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Windradyne is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,309 against 991, roughly 3.3 times the size of Townsend; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Windradyne for recent price momentum, Townsend for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Townsend vs Windradyne: Suburb Comparison 2026