Skip to main content

Towradgi vs Wilberforce

Property investment comparison - Towradgi, NSW 2518 vs Wilberforce, NSW 2756

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Towradgi wins 1, Wilberforce wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTowradgiWilberforce
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$850K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.50%4.96%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+12.7%
3-year house growth-+41.1%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.2%
Population3,2412,957

Towradgi vs Wilberforce: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Towradgi and $1.4M in Wilberforce.

For units, Towradgi sits at a median of $850K against $755K in Wilberforce, which makes Wilberforce the more affordable unit market and Towradgi the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Towradgi (an estimate) and +12.7% in Wilberforce, so recent momentum favours Wilberforce, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Towradgi and 1.2% in Wilberforce, so landlords in Towradgi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Towradgi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,241 against 2,957, larger than Wilberforce; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wilberforce for recent price momentum, Towradgi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison