Skip to main content

Tumut vs Ulong

Property investment comparison - Tumut, NSW 2720 vs Ulong, NSW 2450

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tumut wins 3, Ulong wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTumutUlong
Median house price$525K$520K
Median unit price$380K$560K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%4.30%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.32%
1-year house growth+4.5%-
3-year house growth+24.0%-
Vacancy rate1.1%1.2%
Population6,613215

Tumut vs Ulong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $525K in Tumut and $520K in Ulong, so Ulong is the cheaper entry point, with Tumut houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Tumut sits at a median of $380K against $560K in Ulong, which makes Tumut the more affordable unit market and Ulong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tumut leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.76%, compared with 4.30% in Ulong, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Tumut and 1.2% in Ulong, so landlords in Tumut face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tumut is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,613 against 215, roughly 31 times the size of Ulong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tumut for rental income, Ulong for a lower purchase price, Tumut for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison