Turvey Park vs Windale
Property investment comparison - Turvey Park, NSW 2650 vs Windale, NSW 2306
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Turvey Park wins 0, Windale wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Turvey Park | Windale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780K | $780K |
| Median unit price | - | $385K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.54% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +15.6%estimate | +16.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Population | 3,572 | 3,421 |
Turvey Park vs Windale: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Turvey Park and $780K in Windale.
Over the past year house prices moved +15.6% in Turvey Park (an estimate) and +16.4% in Windale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Windale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.0% in Windale and 1.1% in Turvey Park, so landlords in Windale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Turvey Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,572 against 3,421, larger than Windale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Windale for recent price momentum, Windale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison