Skip to main content

Ulong vs Young

Property investment comparison - Ulong, NSW 2450 vs Young, NSW 2594

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ulong wins 2, Young wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricUlongYoung
Median house price$520K$525K
Median unit price$560K$425K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)5.32%4.76%
1-year house growth-+7.2%
3-year house growth-+19.7%
Vacancy rate1.2%0.9%
Population21510,610

Ulong vs Young: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Ulong and $525K in Young, so Ulong is the cheaper entry point, with Young houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ulong sits at a median of $560K against $425K in Young, which makes Young the more affordable unit market and Ulong the pricier one.

On cash flow, Young leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 4.30% in Ulong, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Young and 1.2% in Ulong, so landlords in Young face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Young is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,610 against 215, roughly 49 times the size of Ulong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Young for rental income, Ulong for a lower purchase price, Young for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison